Black ; White by The Maine free essay sample

All we got is whats left to take, Hearts so pure in its broken place, Because we are lovers lost in space, Were searching for our saving grace. Those are the chorus lyrics to Saving Grace, one of the best tracks (in my opinion) on The Maines newest album, Black and White. In my opinion, The Maine has done it again. They have a great album here, that anyone can enjoy. The lyrics are a little dirtier than their debut album, but their sound has not changed. They are still the same in some ways but different in others. For example, their lyrics are still deeply meaningful, yet fun. I would strongly recommended purchasing the album as a whole. If you are a fan of The Maine, then you should love most (if not every!) song on the album. Although, if you cannot purchase the full album, some tracks I recommend listening to are: Color, Listen to Your Heart, Growing Up, and Inside of You. We will write a custom essay sample on Black ; White by The Maine or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Also, if you buy the deluxe version of the album, it has two acoustic versions, which are fantastic. The Maine has done it again; theyve come up with hit lyrics, and still have that awesome pop/rock sound to them. I will surely be listening to this album over and over, learning all the lyrics. Its a great buy.

Free Essays on On Descartes Ontological Argument And How It Doesnt Work

In Descartes fifth meditation he tried to use a proof of God’s existence that is known as the ontological argument. I will attempt in this paper to refute the argument. I will be using some citations from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, and will also be using some of my own thoughts and thoughts that are derived from class discussion. I think that it is important to first try to arrange Descartes’ argument into point form, so as to better be able to analyze it. I have translated Descartes argument like this: 1. If I clearly and distinctly perceive some property as belonging to the idea of some thing, then that property really does belong to that thing. 2. The idea of God is of a perfect being. 3. Not existing would be an imperfection. 4. Since the idea of God is of a perfect being, it must be true of the idea that it has the property of always existing, and I clearly and distinctly perceive this. 5. Thus it follows from premises 1 and 4 that God must exist. Now that we have the argument in point form, let us move on and see where it is weak to criticism. Let us begin with the first premise. We can argue that this very first premise already assumes the existence of God. For what Descartes is saying is, let us suppose a thing, simply as an idea. If this idea has this property, and I clearly and distinctly perceive it as having that property, then the object that corresponds to the idea must have that property. How did we get from the idea of the thing to there really being a thing that has all the properties that the idea has. Another objection can be raised by examining the example of a mountain and a valley, the same example that Descartes uses . He says that it is impossible for us to separate the idea of a mountain from a valley, but it surely does not follow that a mountain and a valley exist in the world, only that were there to be one, there would be the other. This however is not the same way with God... Free Essays on On Descartes Ontological Argument And How It Doesn't Work Free Essays on On Descartes Ontological Argument And How It Doesn't Work In Descartes fifth meditation he tried to use a proof of God’s existence that is known as the ontological argument. I will attempt in this paper to refute the argument. I will be using some citations from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, and will also be using some of my own thoughts and thoughts that are derived from class discussion. I think that it is important to first try to arrange Descartes’ argument into point form, so as to better be able to analyze it. I have translated Descartes argument like this: 1. If I clearly and distinctly perceive some property as belonging to the idea of some thing, then that property really does belong to that thing. 2. The idea of God is of a perfect being. 3. Not existing would be an imperfection. 4. Since the idea of God is of a perfect being, it must be true of the idea that it has the property of always existing, and I clearly and distinctly perceive this. 5. Thus it follows from premises 1 and 4 that God must exist. Now that we have the argument in point form, let us move on and see where it is weak to criticism. Let us begin with the first premise. We can argue that this very first premise already assumes the existence of God. For what Descartes is saying is, let us suppose a thing, simply as an idea. If this idea has this property, and I clearly and distinctly perceive it as having that property, then the object that corresponds to the idea must have that property. How did we get from the idea of the thing to there really being a thing that has all the properties that the idea has. Another objection can be raised by examining the example of a mountain and a valley, the same example that Descartes uses . He says that it is impossible for us to separate the idea of a mountain from a valley, but it surely does not follow that a mountain and a valley exist in the world, only that were there to be one, there would be the other. This however is not the same way with God...